Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1088

reference
519-tree-1
name
1088
tree-preservation-order

undefined

519-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022467 50.897614)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022410 50.897608,-1.022412 50.897619,-1.022420 50.897629,-1.022433 50.897637,-1.022448 50.897642,-1.022466 50.897644,-1.022484 50.897643,-1.022499 50.897638,-1.022512 50.897630,-1.022521 50.897620,-1.022524 50.897609,-1.022521 50.897598,-1.022513 50.897587,-1.022501 50.897579,-1.022485 50.897574,-1.022467 50.897572,-1.022450 50.897574,-1.022434 50.897579,-1.022421 50.897587,-1.022413 50.897597,-1.022410 50.897608)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL